Work in order: first the hypothesis, then the critical assumptions, then the criteria, and only then the experiment. Write the decision only once you have the result. Do not change the order, or you undermine the whole canvas.
01
Hypothesis
A hypothesis is one testable statement in the form 'We believe that [audience] [shows this behaviour / has this problem / recognises this value] because [assumption]'. No opinions, no vagueness: a claim that can be factually confirmed or refuted. A good hypothesis specifies who, what and why; otherwise you cannot design the experiment that would break it.
Questions that help
- ·What do we believe, and about whom exactly?
- ·Which behaviour or outcome would support the hypothesis?
- ·Can this be tested within four weeks?
Example
We believe that job planners at SME construction firms are willing to pay €99 a month for a planning tool with clash detection, because they currently lose two hours every week to rework caused by double bookings.
Common mistake
A hypothesis that is really a wish ('We believe this will be a great success'). It cannot be tested, so it is no use.
02
Riskiest Assumptions
Every hypothesis hides several assumptions. The riskiest is the one that brings the whole hypothesis down if it is wrong, and that you know least about. Say your hypothesis assumes that (a) there is a problem, (b) your solution solves it, (c) people want to pay for it, (d) you can reach them. Which is the most fragile? That is what you test.
Questions that help
- ·Which assumption is the most fragile?
- ·Which one do we have the least evidence for?
- ·What would happen if this assumption turned out to be wrong?
Example
For the planning tool: the assumption that job planners make the buying decision themselves (rather than the owner) is the riskiest. If it falls away, your whole go-to-market is wrong.
Common mistake
Choosing a 'safe' assumption to test because it is easy to confirm. Test what would hurt you most if it were wrong.
03
Success Criteria
In advance, not afterwards, you record which result confirms the hypothesis. A concrete threshold: '7 out of 10 test customers choose the paid subscription within 14 days.' Not 'positive reactions'. Not 'we feel it is working'. Without a criterion fixed in advance, every result stays open to interpretation, and interpretation is usually wishful thinking.
Questions that help
- ·Which number or behaviour proves the hypothesis is right?
- ·What is an acceptable result, and what would be a disappointment?
- ·Who signs off on this threshold in advance?
Example
Success criterion: at least 8 out of 15 visitors click 'buy now' after seeing the landing page; at least 3 of them actually complete the payment.
Common mistake
A vague criterion ('enough interest') or a criterion that gets adjusted afterwards. Both make the whole experiment meaningless.
04
Experiment
Here you describe how you will test it. Which type of test (landing page, interview, concierge MVP, price A/B test, prototype), which audience (how selected, how many people), which duration, which variables you hold constant and which you let vary. An experiment you cannot reproduce is not an experiment; it is an anecdote.
Questions that help
- ·What is the cheapest way to test this?
- ·How many people do I need for statistically meaningful data?
- ·How do I make sure the outcome is not caused by something else?
Example
Two weeks of A/B testing a landing page through LinkedIn ads, targeting job planners at SME construction firms, budget €500, an expected 250 visitors per variant, main metric: conversion to 'book a demo'.
Common mistake
Designing an experiment that changes so many variables at once that afterwards you do not know what made the difference.
05
Result
Fill in this block only after the experiment has finished. Write down factually what happened: numbers, percentages, quotes, behaviour. No interpretation yet, only raw observations. Add context (duration, actual sample size, odd events during the test) so you can judge later how reliable the result is.
Questions that help
- ·What was actually measured, without interpretation?
- ·How large was the final sample?
- ·Which external factors could have distorted the picture?
Example
Result: 247 visitors, 31 demo requests (12.5%), 7 payments after a demo (€693 in revenue). The threshold was 8 payments, so just below.
Common mistake
Mixing result and interpretation. 'It worked well' is not a result. Facts first.
06
Decision
The decision forces you and your team to choose explicitly. Three options: persevere (the assumption holds well enough, carry on), pivot (the assumption partly holds, adjust course) or stop (the assumption has been refuted, abandon this direction). One sentence, the date, and who made the decision. This prevents the most persistent startup disease: carrying on with a hypothesis that has in fact been refuted.
Questions that help
- ·Based on the result: persevere, pivot or stop?
- ·What is the first follow-up action within 7 days?
- ·Who signs off on it, and who needs to be informed?
Example
Decision (12 March): pivot. We will target owners of construction firms as buyers instead of job planners. Next experiment: outreach through the networks of Bouwend Nederland, the Dutch construction trade association.
Common mistake
Taking a 'soft' decision ('we will keep an eye on it for a while'). The canvas loses its value if no clear go/no-go comes out of it.